When a person in North Dakota suffers a personal injury that results from using a defective or dangerous product, he or she has the right to seek recovery of damages. This was what a man in another state did after he was seriously injured while riding an off-road vehicle that he alleges was defective. The manufacturer of the vehicle, Polaris Industries Inc., along with related entities that include the dealership where it was bought, were listed as defendants in the products liability lawsuit.
Every year, on the Fourth of July, thousands of people suffer injuries caused by fireworks. These typically range from minor to severe and often result from irresponsible use or due to defective products. Although authorities provide safety tips and warnings every year, some consumers fail to recognize the fact that every firework is a potentially dangerous product that should be handled with care. A North Dakota man reportedly suffered serious injuries that were caused by an exploding firework.
North Dakota oil field workers in the Bakken face multiple hazards every day. Added to the usual perils associated with the nature of their jobs, the equipment they use poses further threats. Faulty design or manufacturing, or a lack of warning on the labeling can cause catastrophic injuries. Unfortunately, a product defect is often only recognized after a tragic event that maims or kills a worker.
Many workers in North Dakota may not be aware of the fact that a workplace accident might support a personal injury claim for items not included in a workers' compensation benefits claim. An instance of such circumstances would be if a defective piece of equipment caused the injury. The most significant advantage of filing a products liability lawsuit in a civil court is the prospect of receiving compensation that is unavailable through the workers' compensation program. An injured victim can pursue claims for pain and suffering, loss of life enjoyment, future medical treatment and more.
Whenever anybody in North Dakota or another state suffers injuries that might have been caused by a malfunctioning piece of equipment, full recovery of damages may be a significant challenge. Sometimes, a product defect is clearly visible and easy to identify, while only close investigation can detect other defects. To prove liability on the part of a manufacturer is a task that might be best achieved by experienced attorneys such as Edwards, Frickle & Culver.
North Dakota users of e-cigarettes may want to take heed of the dangers posed by the devices. An off-duty EMT in another state recently suffered severe burn injuries when two batteries of an e-cigarette device exploded in the pocket of his jeans. He says he is considering filing a products liability claim against the manufacturers of the batteries.
When a dangerous or defective product harms a North Dakota resident, the victim may consider filing a lawsuit against the responsible parties. Challenging a large company in court by filing a products liability lawsuit may seem unachievable. However, the defective product might have also caused harm to others, and a class action lawsuit might be a viable option.
North Dakota residents may join others nationwide in wondering about Tesla's self-driving technology and the company's responsibility in the event of an accident. Could such accidents lead to products liability claims? Some say the well-established rules of law may not apply to this new technology.
North Dakota residents who suffer the consequences of the negligence of other parties or injuries caused by dangerous or defective products may pursue financial relief through the civil court. Such action was recently initiated by an injured man and his wife in another state. They allege negligence by a driver along with products liability by the creator of an app called Snapchat.
North Dakota owners of off-road vehicles may want to check whether theirs is one of the defective vehicles that is the subject of a voluntary recall. The Consumer Product Safety Commission reported that Polaris announced the recall of 133,000 ATVs. This action followed after updated reports indicated that this dangerous product has been the cause of 160 incidents of fire.